Talk:Debt to Intention

From Cashwiki.org.org, the Money Wiki
Revision as of 11:21, 4 September 2009 by Dante (talk | contribs) (temporary discussion - what units are currency)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

temporary discussion :

I feel the solutions that come out of all of these research topics are all inter-related.

Which units are currency in an information system ? ( including in RBE )

What transaction architectures are not part of governance ?

third question could be "what does <<Public>> mean" ?


Nathan , I like the Resource Based Economics vision, yet as from my point of view it still requires transactions within an information system ( hopefully some kind of libre MetaCortex/Noosphere :-p ), I wonder if it is correct to say that it works without money, depending on what is defined as money ?

Is money currency, and is currency money ?

Which units enabling exchanges ( including non-reciprocal exchanges / transactions ) within an information system are defined as money ?

Definition of "Currency" on wiktionary :

" a countable unit which symbolize real value "

" Money or other item used to facilitate transactions "

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/currency


To show further how all of this is intertwined :

certain intentional mutual credit systems could, I believe, be defined as " Local welfare systems favouring social cohesion " ( SSH.2010.2.1-2 )

such as Fureai Kippu - I suggest googling it further.

I also imagine that certain information systems can directly include intentional units ( reversed debt ? requests for support ? ) within transactions, and create intentional markets, combined with actual support units to these intentional units, and reputation units, hence offering new modes of governance...

There seems not to be a clear border...

When researching the future of the public sector, which public sector are we talking about ?

A public sector controlled by... a geographically defined power structure ?

or a public sector managed by ... distributed intentional information systems ?

Some convergence points seem to be "Commons" , "Distributed Systems" , "Transactions" , ... and a shift from a paradigm of "Competition, Coercion and Obligations" to a paradigm of "Synergies through Shared Inspiration and intrinsically motivated initiatives" :

Enabling greater complexity through opening up opportunities for response-ability.